Which approach best refers to analyzing authors' opinions in texts?

Analyzing authors' opinions in texts is best described by critical analysis of points of view, as this approach involves examining and interpreting the beliefs, perspectives, and values that authors express in their work. It requires a deeper engagement with the text, allowing readers to evaluate how an author's viewpoint shapes meaning and affects the reader’s understanding. This method not only focuses on identifying the opinions but also looks at how context, tone, and logical reasoning contribute to these perspectives, leading to a richer comprehension of the text's implications.

In contrast, summarizing main arguments focuses more on condensing the core ideas of a text instead of critically evaluating the author's stance. Comparing literature and non-fiction involves analyzing different genres, but it does not specifically target the assessment of opinions. Exploring narrative techniques relates to the methods authors use to tell a story rather than the opinions or viewpoints they present. Each of these options serves its own purpose, but it is the critical analysis of points of view that specifically pertains to understanding and dissecting the opinions of authors within texts.